News Intelligence Analysis
Directory of Pending Dominionist Bills in Congress Plus Legal Analysis
Dominionist Bill Limits the Supreme
Court's Jurisdiction
The Constitution Restoration
Act of 2004 and Now 2005
by Katherine Yurica
You read it here first. The Yurica
Report published
articles revealing the intentions of Dominionists to
revamp the American Federal Court system. The
first major attempt has been placed before both
houses of Congress in two nearly identical bills.
Drafted by Herb Titus, the first Dean of Pat
Robertson's School of Public Policy and a
known Dominionist, our question is: What is
actually intended by the Constitution Restoration
Act of 2004? If the bill passes, the Supreme Court
will be placed under the Dominionists' thumb.
(Updated February 28, 2004 with an editor's
note and August 8, 2004.)
The Marriage Boomerang Amendment
On the New Regulation of
Everyone’s
Marriage in the U.S.A.
By Katherine Yurica
June 6, 2006
(With a little help from Edith Earle Fonder)
I know and you know that
the President and his
dominionist congress have called this the “Anti-
Gay Marriage Amendment.” But don’t let them
fool you. Folks, wake up! This amendment isn’t
about homosexual marriages—the word “homosexual”
isn’t even mentioned in it. It’s about you and your
marriage and how it can be controlled in
the not to
distant future!
The Federal Marriage Amendment:
Why Conservatives and Liberals
Alike Should Be Very Glad It Failed
by Bob Barr as published
by FindLaw.com
Friday, July 16, 2004 at 10:00 AM
On Wednesday, July 14, the Federal
Marriage
Amendment (FMA) failed in the Senate. That's a
good thing - because it was entirely unnecessary,
especially given the existence of the Defense of
Marriage Act (DOMA), which
I authored.
Senate Emphasis on Ideology Has
Some in G.O.P. Anxious
By CARL HULSE
WASHINGTON, June 6 — Though some
Republican candidates may relish the Senate's
current concentration on same-sex marriage
and other ideologically charged topics, Senator
Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island is not among them.
"It may stir up my primary voters a little bit against
me," said Mr. Chafee, a centrist Republican up for re-
election. He opposes the push for a constitutional
amendment to prohibit same-sex marriage and is
under intense pressure to back a proposed amendment
that would
forbid flag burning.
HR 3313: The Marriage
Protection
Act Bill Passed by the House of
Representatives: Trying to Make
Sense of the Nonsensical
By Vickram David Amar
One of America's leading constitutional experts analyzes
the bill passed - almost entirely along party lines -- by
the House of Representatives on July 22. The bill is known
as the "Marriage Protection Act (MPA)." Congressional
Republicans may have shot themselves in the foot again.
Vic Amar writes, "The MPA is intended to bar federal courts
from forcing a state to recognize same-sex marriages
entered into in another state. But as drafted, it does nothing
of the sort. Indeed, if enacted it might even lead to more
interstate recognition of same-sex marriages."
U. S. Senator Wayne Allard Re-Introduces
Federal Marriage Amendment Bill
An analysis of why the revised version still denies
the legal incidents of marriage to gays
By Katherine Yurica
The Yurica Report learned that U.S. Senator
Wayne Allard (R-Colorado) re-introduced his Federal
Marriage Amendment (FMA) in the Senate on March
22, 2004. "I have made some technical changes to
fine-tune the language of the FMA," Senator Allard
said. "The new language makes the intent of the
legislation even clearer: to protect marriage in this
country as the union
between a man and a woman...
Backers Revise Amendment
on Marriage
By CARL HULSE
March 23, 2004
WASHINGTON, The Congressional authors
of a proposed constitutional amendment to ban
gay marriage introduced a slightly reworded
version on Monday, saying the changes were
intended to make it clear that they do not seek
to bar same-sex civil unions
allowed by state law.
Dominionist Bill Allows Congress to
Overturn a Supreme Court Decision
HR 3920 IH, the "Congressional
Accountability for
Judicial Activism Act of 2004 was introducted in the
House by twelve congressmen and allows congress to
overturn any decision of the Supreme Court that rules
on the constitutionality of an Act of Congress.
Dominionism marches on!
For Whom the Bell Tolls
Dominionists New Version
of
Marriage Amendment Fails Again
By Katherine Yurica
The Federal Marriage Amendment
Bill was
amended on March 22, 2004. The text of the
revised version is just as murky as the original.
Read about the problems that still exist. The
Yurica Report's analysis is here.
If you have not read For
Whom the Bell Tolls,
by Katherine Yurica read the complete revised
version now.
America Stands on the
Edge
of A Grave Constitutional Crisis
Linked to Pat Robertson
How the GOP congressional
faction is
executing a plan to intimidate and control
the U.S. Federal Courts
By Katherine Yurica
The factious Republican leaders
have adopted
Pat Robertson's devious ideas on how to overthrow
the balance of powers between the three branches
of government and subdue the independence of the
Federal Courts.
Rogue Republican Dons
in
Congress Tear Up the Constitution,
Exclude Democrats and Accept
a New Title: "The Godfathers"
Why the New Medicare Law,
the
Energy Bill
And the Omnibus Appropriations
Bill
May All Be Unconstitutional
By Katherine Yurica
RICO!
Why the Bush Administration
Should Be Prosecuted as a Racketeer
Influenced Corrupt Organization
By Katherine Yurica
In recent months many commentators
have
advised their audiences that impeachment proceedings
against George W. Bush will never happen. What then
can be done? In this article, Katherine Yurica proposes
something that has never been done in the history of the
United States, the filing of civil and/or criminal RICO lawsuits
against the president and his administration. This is a must
read
article
with national implications.
Back to The Yurica Report Home Page
Copyright © 2005 Yurica Report. All rights reserved.