News Intelligence Analysis
House Ethics Committee Criticizes DeLay
Friday October 1, 2004 9:16 AM
By SUZANNE GAMBOA
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, admonished by the House ethics committee for acting improperly by trying to persuade a Michigan Republican to change his vote on a Medicare prescription drug bill, could face another investigation by the panel.
The committee on Thursday approved an investigative report that serves as ``a public admonishment'' against DeLay, R-Texas, Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., and the lawmaker they were trying to influence, Rep. Nick Smith.
The committee found after its six-month investigation that DeLay and Miller linked a favorable vote by Smith to support of the House candidacy of Smith's son.
The committee still must decide whether to dismiss or appoint an investigative subcommittee to probe a separate three-part complaint against DeLay filed by Rep. Chris Bell, R-Texas.
The complaint alleges DeLay misused his office and federal resources for political purposes related to elections and redistricting in Texas. The 10-member committee, divided along party lines, is under no deadline to make that decision.
The public admonishments issued in the case of Smith's Medicare vote are the lightest punishment the ethics committee can issue when it finds House rules have been violated.
The investigation, by a four-member subcommittee, was triggered when the retiring Smith said that unidentified lawmakers and business interests promised substantial money to his son's congressional campaign if he voted for the Medicare legislation.
Smith said the same interests threatened to support other candidates if he didn't change his vote from ``no'' to ``yes.''
He was not persuaded and stuck with his vote against the legislation in the Nov. 22, 2003, tally that ended at 5:51 a.m. The legislation passed the House by five votes.
It is common for lawmakers to trade legislative votes to get legislation passed, the committee said. However, promising political support for a member's relative ``goes beyond the boundaries of party discipline and should not be used as the basis of a bargain for members to achieve their respective goals,'' the committee said.
DeLay said he accepted the committee's guidance that linking official actions with political considerations is impermissible and violates House rules.
``During my entire career I have worked to advance my party's legislative agenda. However, to this end, I would never knowingly violate the rules of the House,'' he said. ``I deeply believe that as members of the House we must conduct ourselves at all times in a manner that reflects creditably on this institution.''
Miller said she accepted ``their findings that I may have committed a 'discreet violation of the rules.' I also agree with the committee's finding that there was no evidence adduced of a pattern of misconduct.''
Smith had no immediate comment.
Smith stated to the committee that DeLay said to him, in a conversation that lasted about eight seconds: ``I will personally endorse your son. That's my last offer.'' DeLay's account was mostly consistent with that of Smith, the report said.
Miller made a statement to Smith ``that referenced the congressional candidacy'' of Smith's son, the committee said. ``Representative Smith fairly interpreted Representative Miller's statements to him during the vote as a threat of retaliation against him for voting in opposition to the bill.''
Miller recalled that she said something like, ``Well, I hope your son doesn't come to Congress, or I'm not going to support your son, or something to that effect.''
The report said Smith then ``rose up out of his seat and said, 'You get out of here.'''
In finding fault with Smith, the report said his statements about the financial offer ``appear to have been the result of speculation or exaggeration'' on his part.
Smith said the amount offered for his son's campaign was $100,000. But on Dec. 5, Smith partially reversed himself in an interview with The Associated Press.
He said someone outside Congress had offered his son ``substantial and aggressive campaign support'' and Smith assumed that meant financial support. He said it was ``technically incorrect'' to say money was offered.
Smith also said Republicans weren't pressuring him to back away from his previous comments.
His son, Brad, lost in a six-candidate primary.
The ethics panel is formally the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. The new Medicare law was signed in December.
Associated Press writer Larry Margasak contributed to this report.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
Send a letter
to the editor
about
this article
Related Articles:
America
Stands on the Edge
of a Grave Constitutional
Crisis
Linked
to Pat Robertson
John Dean Exposes a
Rogue
Republican Congress:
A $328 billion spending bill,
created in
secret, with giveaways galore, will be
the first order of business when Congress
returns in January. Dean says, "About half
of America has no voice in Congress at
all." Find
out why Americans must object
to a rubberstamp legislative branch.
Republican
Forced Exclusion of
Democrats from legislative participation
violates House and Senate
tradition and places
an ominous threat over the democratic process
as it disenfranchises fifty percent of Americans
from representative government. Read the facts
from the congressional editor of the Washington
Post.
Who Tried to Bribe
Rep. Smith?
Winning-at-any-cost as a
policy may cost Republicans
too much. Think jail terms
for bribery and extortion
in the battle to get the
Medicare Bill Passed.
Conservative
Republicans Rebelled
A critical review
of the tactics
Repugs resorted to in order to
get the Medicare Bill passed
in the House. This time the
"enemy" targeted was other
Republicans. Get an insiders
picture of what happened
during the long hours of
"hazing," pressure and
"ugly stuff."
Excerpts
from
The
New Messiahs
The
Despoiling of America
How George W. Bush became
the head of the new American
Dominionist
Church/State
Copyright © 2004 Yurica Report. All rights reserved.