How the Neo-Conservatives Operate
Originally published by the Palestine Chronicle
"By now the names of the key players in this movement and their inter-relationships have become well known. Whether connected by marriage or because they went to school together .."
By James J. Zogby
Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 03:53 PM GMT
A number of articles have appeared in recent weeks shedding new light on the thinking of the neo-conservatives who have, until now, appeared to have the upper hand in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush administration.
It is only in the past few years that attention has been paid to this small but important group of ideologues.
But now, several publications have featured stories and analyses of the group, their intellectual roots and their modus operandi.
It may well be that the neo-conservatives singular success — the march to war with Iraq — is what finally brought them out of the shadows into the public eye.
Attention is being given to their earlier successes in dominating several conservative think-tanks and magazines and key positions in the Bush administration’s foreign policy apparatus and their small but influential network of columnists and commentators that have allowed them to shape the policy debate both inside and outside of government.
By now the names of the key players in this movement and their inter-relationships have become well known. Whether connected by marriage or because they went to school together or shared common employers, friends, and teachers or simply live in the same neighborhoods, the group and their relationship with one another has become the target of journalists from the right and the left.
What has also come to light are the political roots of these neo-conservatives. They were, in the main, once liberal Democrats who sprang, as it were, out of the womb of Commentary Magazine (a publication subsidized by the American Jewish Committee) and the offices of the late Henry “Scoop” Jackson (a Democratic senator known for his hawkish views on foreign policy).
It was this still fledgling neo-conservative movement that broke with President Carter’s human rights-based foreign policy and working with, a then little-known Israeli politician, Benjamin Netanyahu, helped to spur the Reagan administration’s shift to a foreign policy based on opposition to ‘Soviet-sponsored terrorism.’
They embraced Ronald Reagan and were, in turn, embraced by his administration.
These same neo-conservatives, however, were largely rebuffed by Bush Senior who pursued a more traditional foreign policy agenda, and were relentless foes of the Clinton administration whose foreign policy was based on multilateral engagement, promotion of trade and the pursuit of negotiated settlements to conflict.
Their late 1990s treatise on American foreign and military policy “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century”, has now been adopted by the new Bush administration as “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America.”
The hallmark of the neo-conservatives thinking has been their belief that the US should project both political and military dominance in the post-Cold War world.
It was this that led them to advocate US abandonment of several international agreements and conferences and to press for the largely unilateral war with Iraq.
While much of this has been known, what is new, has been found in articles that explore the intellectual underpinnings of this movement providing insights into their political thinking.
Since a number of key neo-conservatives have studied with the political philosopher Leo Strauss, several researchers have probed the writings of Strauss and other Strauss disciples for clues into the ideas that have shaped the operational side of neo-conservative practice.
From the articles that have appeared, three central notions emerge:
The role of elites
William Pfaff writing in the International Herald Tribune describes Strauss’ followers as a “cult” noting that Strauss believed that “essential truth about human society and history should be held by an elite and withheld from others who lack the fortitude to deal with truth.”
Another Strauss critic quoted in a lengthy New Yorker piece observes, “Strauss believed that good statesmen…must rely on an inner circle,” and notes that this is how the neo-conservatives have come to see themselves.
Deceit as diplomacy
Connected to the important role played by elites as the protectors of truth is the notion that “philosophers need to tell noble lies not only to the people at large also to powerful politicians [whom they serve].”
Pfaff writes that in their view “it has been necessary to tell lies to people about the nature of political reality…The elite keeps the truth to itself… This gives it insight and …power that others do not possess.”
In this same context, the New Yorker article quotes one neo-conservative who has been in charge of the Defense Department’s special intelligence unit who wrote that “deception is the norm in political life.”
The need to have an external threat
A few recent articles have also quoted Shadia Drury’s book Leo Strauss and the American Right in which she wrote “Strauss thinks that the political order can only be stable if it is united by an external threat.
Following Machiavelli, he maintains that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured….in Strauss’ view you have to fight all the time… [this leads to an] ‘aggressive belligerent foreign policy.’”
Putting all this together, Joshua Jonah Marshall, writing in The Washington Monthly, describes neo-conservative political practice by providing a lesson from their Reagan administration days:
“The willingness to deceive — both themselves and others — expanded as neo-cons grew more comfortable with power. Many spent the Reagan years orchestrating bloody wars against Soviet proxies in the Third World, portraying things like the Nicaraguan Contras and plain murderers like Jonas Savimbi of Angola as “freedom fighters. The nadir of this deceit was their Iran-Contra scandal…
“But the neo-cons did not dwell on what they got wrong. Rather, the experience of having played a hand in the downfall of so great an evil (as the Soviet Union) led them to the opposite belief: That it’s okay to be spectacularly wrong, even brazenly deceptive about the details, so long as you have a moral vision and a willingness to use force.”
So much of this resonates with the events that have just unfolded leading up to the Iraq war. What is intriguing is that while that war may have been the neo-conservatives big victory, their deceits may also contribute to their undoing.
For example, before the war, the US’s uniformed military argued that the battle plans and postwar scenarios drawn up by the neo-conservative ideologues were inadequate, it now appears that the generals were right.
The entire justification for unilateral preemption was based on the “immediate threat” provided by the neo-cons intelligence sources”. Even if signs of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) are found, it has become increasingly difficult to maintain “immediacy of the threat” posed by the Iraqi regime.
And, before the war, the neo-conservatives portrayed the war as the beginning of a “permanent revolution” that in domino-like fashion would democratize and transform the entire Middle East.
They may continue to threaten Syria and Iran, but continued chaos in Iraq appears to have dampened the rest of the Bush administration’s appetite for the neo-conservatives’ broader regional agenda.
It may be to soon to write off the neo-conservatives as having been eclipsed, as some traditional conservatives are now suggesting. But, there are signs that the Bush administration is tilting in a slightly different direction.
President Bush, after all, did endorse the Road Map which many neo-conservatives opposed and the State Department appears to be back in the drivers’ seat in managing the peace process, such as it is.
Secretary Powell did help to defuse the situation with Syria. And when some neo-conservatives attacked Powell and the entire State Department for this effort, the White House was quick to come to Powell’s defense.
With the Bush administration’s political strategists now planning for the president’s re-election bid, one analyst notes, “there is a lot less enthusiasm for the neo-con crowd.”
Some in the White House are blaming the “neo conservatives and certain figures in the Pentagon for their “inadequate postwar planning” and their drive “to impose a Pax-Americana on the world”.
At this time it may be too early to predict how this battle within the Bush administration will be resolved. But the lessons about neo-conservative thinking and practices learned from the last round are invaluable and should be remembered as we go forward.
For comments or information, contact jzogby@aaiusa.org or http://www.aaiusa.org.
Send a letter
to the editor
about this article
Related Articles:
Rep. Ron Paul's analysis
of the Machiavellian basis
of the Neo-conservative
movement.
A BuzzFlash Interview with
James Moore, a co-
author of Bush's Brain, in
which he shows Karl Rove's
ideology is pure Machiavellian
The New Messiahs Excerpts
reveal the immoral Machiavellian
basis of the religious right
Do you want to know how
to detect evil? Buy these
books:
We give Scott Peck’s book, The People of the Lie, a five star rating. It teaches the reader how to detect evil. If you haven’t read it--read it now. Give it as a gift. Scott Peck tries to find a way to heal human evil. The book is really a journey through his cases as a psychiatrist where he encountered an inexplicable disease that only human love can reach, but which repells the love that seeks to heal it. It’s frightening as he shows how ordinary and common place evil is. It sits in our churches on the pews where upright citizens hide behind a mask of piety. It pours from mouths that lie without constraint. Scott Peck’s book was written for today’s world. It helps us to understand why we are catching glimpses of a dark age that could engulf us.
The Lost Book of Wisdom by K.V. Yurica is a book we’re prejudiced about. (The publisher of this web site is the author.) It’s a book that’s off the main stream scale of measuring things. Most Americans won’t like it unless they’re into literature, poetry, and the excitement of discovering an ancient world where seers explained how to discover a lie, how to know a true prophet from a false one. It’s on ancient science, on knowledge, logic and investigation. It talks about fools, evil and transcendence. It was written long before George W. Bush entered the White House, but it discusses psychological and emotional health as opposed to the Machiavellian rule of today. We think some of you will love it--especially those acquainted with Kahlil Gibran's The Prophet.
Who provoked the conservative revolution?
Shadia Drury provides a fascinating
answer to the question as she examines the
work of Leo Strauss. (Here's a clue: Paul
Wolfovitz received his PhD. under Strauss!)Village Books is a real store with real people.
It has the smell of fresh coffee brewing, and sounds
of music drifting in from the plaza. These are folks
who care about you and they are there for just
one reason: to help you find the book you're
looking for. For a fast direct link to Leo Strauss
and the American Right, click here.
These books are available at our favorite bookstore--which just happens to be open. It's an old fashioned sort of place with real people standing on wooden floors. One can sip a mocha and listen to the sounds of a folk singer drifting through the open doors. We like the owners too. They’re there almost all the time--Saturdays, Sundays--too. They’ll pack these books in a box for you and ship it out and have it delivered to your door. Just click on the book covers--and you’ll go directly to your book. Village Books will take over from there. They’ll make your purchase a pleasure.
If you prefer making your purchases through the web’s largest book store, we’ve anticipated your need and have prepared this link to the home page of Amazon.com. If you have the time and a good eye for bargains, you’ll find them there, in the middle of Amazon’s quaint clutter. One can almost smell the dust trying to settle down after the swish and swosh of the fast paced deals. Just click on the little ad below and you’ll be there in a moment. Then type in the title of this book in the little search box. Click on Go and walla!
If you prefer making your purchase through the web's largest book store, we've anticipated your need and have prepared this link to the home page of Amazon.com. If you have the time and a good eye for bargains, you'll find them there, in the middle of Amazon's quaint clutter. One can almost smell the dust trying to settle down after the swish and swosh of the fast paced deals. Just click on the little ad below and you'll be there in a moment:
Back to The Yurica Report Home Page
