News Intelligence Analysis

 

 

From Evangelical Resources

The Problem of Ethical Dualism

April 10, 2006


by Michael Hamblin



Ethical dualism is the practice of attributing evil exclusively to a particular group or class of people, while ignoring one's own capacity for evil or even considering one's own actions to be good. The result is an "Us" verses "Them" view that polarizes people groups and classes into extremes so that mutual understanding becomes difficult or impossible. This results in a demonization of "them" - exaggerating the evils committed by the illusive "them" and seeing "them" as less than human.


Some of the common groups of people or classes that have been the targets of ethical dualism are the nobility, clergy, the bourgeoisie, Jews, or the corporate elite. It is a common human reaction to problems of injustice to associate injustice with the group or class of people that either caused or is perceived to have caused the injustice. Any time social polarizations occur, such as the current divide between "liberals" and "conservatives", ethical dualisms tend to arise and stifle dialogue.


Who has this tendency toward this "us" versus "them" ethical dualism? Everyone. Without exception, all humans are universally given to thinking highly of themselves, and are capable of extreme anger towards people that they perceive have treated them unjustly. Human beings have a strong sense of the need for justice, but this desire for justice is easily distorted into viewing certain people as those who habitually cause injustice and evil against those who are good and virtuous - assuming that "we" are always the good and virtuous. It is the human sin of pride that causes people to ignore the evil they commit against others, while simultaneously exaggerating the alleged evil others commit against them.


Ethical dualisms are escapable in Christian theology. The key is an understanding of Original Sin on the one hand and the Imago Dei on the other. Because of the Christian doctrine of Original Sin, Christians should recognize that sin is not the exclusive domain of a particular group or class of people. Human sin affects all people equally, including "us." As Solzhenitsyn put it, "the line between good and evil cuts through every human heart." Every human has sin, and the one who thinks himself to be without evil or sin, as if he were some kind of super-man who transcends the categories of good and evil, is living in a sinful self delusion. Christians should be humbled by the recognition of sin in their own lives.


On the other hand, "they" are never completely evil either. No matter what evil may be attributed to "them", "they" are also made in the imago of God - the Imago Dei. Sin has corrupted the image of God in "them" in precisely the same way it has in "us". The critical point comes in realizing that no person or people group is categorically beyond hope of redemption. Instead of seeing "them" as enemies, Christians should be convicted and seek ways to reconcile and make peace.


With the recent release of the movie "The End of the Spear" I am reminded of the plight of the Waodani tribe. Generations of brutal killings had caused warring tribes to be locked into blood feuds. When missionary women were finally able to take part in the life of the tribe, they asked why the men of the tribe speared people in the other tribes. The response was classic of ethical dualism - they laughed and said yes we spear them, but they are really bad people. When the tribe began to realize that spearing people was wrong, they stopped the cycle of bloodshed transforming the Waodani permanently for the better. If the missionaries had not come, it is likely that the Waodani would have died off being unable to sustain a surviveable population.


Related pages and links:


Jordan Cooper: US vs. THEM

JollyBlogger: How Much Depravity and How Much It Applies

Charles Krauthammer: No-Respect Politics

Robert Koons: A Conservative Primer


 

Send a letter 
to the editor 
about this article


Related Articles:



The Despoiling of America
by Katherine Yurica

Stanley Kurtz Attacks Yurica’s,
“The Despoiling of America”

A Response

By Katherine Yurica
May 23, 2005

Stanley Kurtz did his best. In an article titled, “Dominionist
Domination,” published May 2, 2005 by National Review Online,
he tried to attack and crumble the reasoning in my essay,
“The Despoiling of America.” He didn’t have much to work with,
so as a last resort he made up things. He invented an essay
that does not exist and said, “See! Look at what she wrote!”
Then he gave a list of the imaginary faults in his newly rewritten
essay and attributed them to me!


  
Can Democracy Be Christian?

  
An
  Interview With Katherine Yurica

  Questions
  by Terri Murray

  Posted October 10, 2005

  
It depends on how we define “democracy.”
  If we 

  limit it to mean: rule of the majority, then I see 

  an inherent conflict between democracy and 

  the great principles of the Judeo-Christian tradition, 

  because there is such a thing as the 

  “tyranny
  of the majority.”

  
 

  
 

  
The Ship of State Is Sinking,


  Who is on the Lord’s Side?

  A discussion on what kind
  and size 

  of buckets to use to bail out the boat 

  
Katherine Yurica responds to Jim 

  Wallis' and Susan Jacoby's articles

  
 By Katherine Yurica

  
The Yurica Report had
  just begun to post 

  two articles from the American Prospect, one 

  written by Jim Wallis, the publisher of the 

  evangelical Sojourner’s and the other from 

  Susan Jacoby, called “an aggressive secularist” 

  by her publisher, when the questions began 

  about whether a real conflict exists between 

  progressives with faith and those without. 

  A must read essay.

  
 

  
 

  
Bloodguilty Churches

  Why Bush’s Agenda Is
  Immoral 

  and an Abomination to God

  By Katherine Yurica

  
This is a
  stunning major analysis of Mr. 

  Bush's agenda. 

  Updated January
  25, 2005

  
Did you know the Bible prohibits:
  deregulation; 

  vote rigging; privatization of Social Security; tax 

  cuts for the wealthy; invading Iraq; oppressing the 

  Hispanics who cross our borders; cutting Medicaid 

  services; cutting Medicare services; hurting the 

  environment; failing to answer all the questions 

  from the 9/11 families; Tort Reform; torture; lying 

  to congress; bribes; tampering with the justice 

  system; appointing prejudiced nominees to the 

  bench; tipping the scales of justice to favor big 

  corporations? Read Bloodguilty Churches. 

  Don't miss
  this hard hitting new report.

  
 

  
Bloodguilty
  Churches is now available


  in paperback. Click here to see the book.

  
 

  
 

  
Dominionist Bill Limits the
  Supreme 

  Court's Jurisdiction



  The Constitution Restoration Act 

  of 2004 and Now 2005

  
by Katherine Yurica

  
You read it here first. The Yurica
  Report published 

  articles revealing the intentions of Dominionists to 

  revamp the American Federal Court system. The first 

  major attempt has been placed before both houses 

  of Congress in two nearly identical bills. Drafted by 

  Herb
  Titus, the first Dean of Pat Robertson's School 

  of Public Policy and a known Dominionist, our 

  question is: What is actually intended by the 

  Constitution Restoration Act of 2004? If the bill 

  passes, the Supreme Court will be placed under the 

  Dominionists' thumb.

  
 

  

See Also:


Directory on the Rise of Christian Dominionism


Directory on Religious Trends

  
 

  
Strategies, Communication
  and 

  Propanda Techniques

  
 

  
Essays by Katherine Yurica

  
 

  
This article is copyrighted material, the
  use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
  owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
  advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
  economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
  We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
  material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material
  on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
  expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
  for research and educational purposes. For more information go
  to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
  If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes
  of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission
  from the copyright owner.

  
 

  
 

  
Back
  to The Yurica Report Home Page

  
Copyright
  © 2006 Yurica Report. All rights reserved.